Monday, September 13, 2021

天使

天使


「人間は、視力聴力握力だけを自分のもの全体とはみず、人間世界の空間を見たり触れたりできるもので、仕切られるとは思わず、あたかも信仰とよぶところの現実への接近の第二洋式を求め、しかもこの洋式において人間の世界観の決定的開示をみいだすのである。(…)それは見えないもの決して視野にあらわれないものは非現実ではなく、それどころか見えないものこそ、実はすべての現実を担い可能にするものほかならないということの選択を意味している。またそれは、この現実全体を可能にするものこそ、人間に真に人間らしい生存を保証し、人として人間らしい存在を可能にしてくれるものであるとする選択を意味している。」

ラツィンガー著、小林珍雄訳、『キリスト教入門』、エンデルレ書店、9ページ。


iPadから送信

Monday, September 06, 2021

Thomas Pink

The revolution in the official theology of baptism is twofold. Dialogic harmony is given priority over conversion – and the sacramental life of the Church is seen as signifying of salvation, rather than something on which salvation actually depends.
There is a common root – the assumption that diabolic dominion over humanity has already been removed even in advance of baptism, and without any need for the world's conversion. That assumption is what makes the modern Church's pursuit of harmony with the world without its conversion appear feasible, and even a goal to be prioritised over conversion itself.
But the goal of harmony without conversion is not feasible at all. What reveals this is what also provides strong evidence that the operation of grace really does significantly depend on worthy participation in the sacramental life of the Church. This evidence lies in the very visible failure of grace to heal nature without nature's conversion – a failure that lies at the heart of moral conflict between the Church and an unconverted world.
Central to magisterial teaching about baptism is the grim reality, so clearly taught dogmatically at Florence, that the unconverted world remains under the dominion of the devil. Consequently, as Christ himself clearly proclaimed, baptism is a source not of harmony with the unconverted world but of spiritual confrontation of it and spiritual conflict with it – a spiritual conflict that can be ended only by the world's conversion.
The crisis of Amoris Laetitia is not a theological crisis of the current pontificate alone, It is not isolated, and it has parallels elsewhere that had already arisen under previous


iPadから送信

Wednesday, September 01, 2021

Cajetan on the pope

Thomas Cajetan's commentary on the Summa Theologica:

"If someone, for a reasonable motive, holds the person of the pope in suspicion and refuses his presence and even his jurisdiction, he does not commit the delict of schism, nor any other whatsoever, provided that he be ready to accept the pope were he not held in suspicion. It goes without saying that one has the right to avoid what is harmful and to ward off dangers. In fact, it may happen that the pope could govern tyrannically, and that is all the easier as he is the more powerful and does not fear any punishment from anyone on earth."


iPadから送信